Kuwait vs Pakistan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Kuwait
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.5195 constant LCU against 0.099 constant LCU in Kuwait, a difference of 0.4205 constant LCU.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 5.2 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Pakistan ahead.
Kuwait ranks 63rd and Pakistan ranks 60th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -100 constant LCU | 25 constant LCU | 125 constant LCU | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 21,580 constant LCU | -0.0029 constant LCU | 21,580 constant LCU | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Kuwait or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.5195 constant LCU against 0.099 constant LCU in Kuwait as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Kuwait and Pakistan?
- 0.4205 constant LCU, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Pakistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Pakistan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Kuwait ranks 63rd and Pakistan ranks 60th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.