Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Palestine: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports -118.60 million constant LCU against -268.68 million constant LCU in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 150.08 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Palestine ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 122nd and Palestine ranks 120th of 154 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -89.25 million constant LCU | 28.52 million constant LCU | 117.77 million constant LCU | Palestine |
| 2020s | -196.69 million constant LCU | -138.32 million constant LCU | 58.37 million constant LCU | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Palestine?
- Palestine, at -118.60 million constant LCU against -268.68 million constant LCU in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine?
- 150.08 million constant LCU, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 122nd and Palestine ranks 120th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.