Kiribati vs Seychelles: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Kiribati
- Seychelles
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 6.50 million constant LCU against 840,000 constant LCU in Seychelles, a difference of 5.66 million constant LCU.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 7.7 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Seychelles ahead.
Kiribati ranks 50th and Seychelles ranks 53rd of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -605,913 constant LCU | 100 constant LCU | 606,013 constant LCU | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 611,136 constant LCU | 451,940 constant LCU | 159,196 constant LCU | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Kiribati or Seychelles?
- Kiribati, at 6.50 million constant LCU against 840,000 constant LCU in Seychelles as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Kiribati and Seychelles?
- 5.66 million constant LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Seychelles?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Seychelles rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Kiribati ranks 50th and Seychelles ranks 53rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.