Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports -734.75 billion constant LCU against -1.88 trillion constant LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.15 trillion constant LCU.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 150th and Russian Federation ranks 147th of 154 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.25 trillion constant LCU | -20.80 billion constant LCU | 1.23 trillion constant LCU | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | -1.56 trillion constant LCU | -728.24 billion constant LCU | 830.14 billion constant LCU | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Kazakhstan or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at -734.75 billion constant LCU against -1.88 trillion constant LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
- 1.15 trillion constant LCU, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Russian Federation rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 150th and Russian Federation ranks 147th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.