Guinea-Bissau vs Timor-Leste: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports -51 constant LCU against -200 constant LCU in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 149 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Timor-Leste ranks 103rd of 154 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -20 constant LCU | -40 constant LCU | 20 constant LCU | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 40 constant LCU | -10.2 constant LCU | 50.2 constant LCU | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Guinea-Bissau or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at -51 constant LCU against -200 constant LCU in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Guinea-Bissau and Timor-Leste?
- 149 constant LCU, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Timor-Leste?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Timor-Leste rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Timor-Leste ranks 103rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.