Greenland vs Mozambique: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Greenland
- Mozambique
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 274.00 million constant LCU against 229.85 million constant LCU in Mozambique, a difference of 44.15 million constant LCU.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 40th and Mozambique ranks 41st of 154 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 193.90 million constant LCU | 12,400 constant LCU | 193.89 million constant LCU | Greenland |
| 2020s | 173.78 million constant LCU | 81.66 million constant LCU | 92.11 million constant LCU | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Greenland or Mozambique?
- Greenland, at 274.00 million constant LCU against 229.85 million constant LCU in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Greenland and Mozambique?
- 44.15 million constant LCU, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Mozambique?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Mozambique rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Greenland ranks 40th and Mozambique ranks 41st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.