Ghana vs Greenland: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Ghana
- Greenland
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 480.43 million constant LCU against 274.00 million constant LCU in Greenland, a difference of 206.43 million constant LCU.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.8 times Greenland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 37th and Greenland ranks 40th of 154 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.29 constant LCU | 215.99 million constant LCU | 215.99 million constant LCU | Greenland |
| 2020s | 52 constant LCU | 173.78 million constant LCU | 173.77 million constant LCU | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Ghana or Greenland?
- Ghana, at 480.43 million constant LCU against 274.00 million constant LCU in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Ghana and Greenland?
- 206.43 million constant LCU, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Greenland rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Ghana ranks 37th and Greenland ranks 40th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.