Georgia vs Sierra Leone: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Georgia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 858.50 million constant LCU against 604.83 million constant LCU in Sierra Leone, a difference of 253.67 million constant LCU.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Georgia ranks 32nd and Sierra Leone ranks 35th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -284,000 constant LCU | 128,200 constant LCU | 412,200 constant LCU | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 479.06 million constant LCU | 100.91 million constant LCU | 378.15 million constant LCU | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Georgia or Sierra Leone?
- Georgia, at 858.50 million constant LCU against 604.83 million constant LCU in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 253.67 million constant LCU, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Sierra Leone rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Georgia ranks 32nd and Sierra Leone ranks 35th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.