Gambia vs Solomon Islands: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Gambia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1.00 billion constant LCU against 818.02 million constant LCU in Solomon Islands, a difference of 182.97 million constant LCU.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Gambia ranks 31st and Solomon Islands ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -517.85 million constant LCU | 210.33 million constant LCU | 728.18 million constant LCU | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | -333.34 million constant LCU | 419.81 million constant LCU | 753.14 million constant LCU | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Gambia or Solomon Islands?
- Gambia, at 1.00 billion constant LCU against 818.02 million constant LCU in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 182.97 million constant LCU, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Solomon Islands rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 31st and Solomon Islands ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.