Ethiopia vs Romania: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Ethiopia
- Romania
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 154.16 billion constant LCU against 66.04 billion constant LCU in Romania, a difference of 88.12 billion constant LCU.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 2.3 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 11th and Romania ranks 13th of 154 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.76 billion constant LCU | 26.79 billion constant LCU | 10.97 billion constant LCU | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 71.42 billion constant LCU | 51.85 billion constant LCU | 19.57 billion constant LCU | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Ethiopia or Romania?
- Ethiopia, at 154.16 billion constant LCU against 66.04 billion constant LCU in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Ethiopia and Romania?
- 88.12 billion constant LCU, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Ethiopia and Romania rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Ethiopia ranks 11th and Romania ranks 13th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.