Equatorial Guinea vs Seychelles: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 840,000 constant LCU against 474,200 constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 365,800 constant LCU.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.8 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Seychelles ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th and Seychelles ranks 53rd of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 112,150 constant LCU | 15,550 constant LCU | 96,600 constant LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 126,450 constant LCU | 516,617 constant LCU | 390,167 constant LCU | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 840,000 constant LCU against 474,200 constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles?
- 365,800 constant LCU, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Seychelles rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th and Seychelles ranks 53rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.