Equatorial Guinea vs Marshall Islands: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 2.18 million constant LCU against 474,200 constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.71 million constant LCU.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 4.6 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th and Marshall Islands ranks 52nd of 154 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 134,600 constant LCU | -12.29 million constant LCU | 12.43 million constant LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 56,900 constant LCU | -18.81 million constant LCU | 18.87 million constant LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 2.18 million constant LCU against 474,200 constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
- 1.71 million constant LCU, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th and Marshall Islands ranks 52nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.