Ecuador vs Solomon Islands: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Ecuador
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 818.02 million constant LCU against 568.91 million constant LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 249.10 million constant LCU.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Ecuador ranks 36th and Solomon Islands ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 constant LCU | 36.80 million constant LCU | 36.80 million constant LCU | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 391.29 million constant LCU | 419.81 million constant LCU | 28.51 million constant LCU | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Ecuador or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 818.02 million constant LCU against 568.91 million constant LCU in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
- 249.10 million constant LCU, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Solomon Islands rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 36th and Solomon Islands ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.