Ecuador vs Ghana: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Ecuador
- Ghana
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 568.91 million constant LCU against 480.43 million constant LCU in Ghana, a difference of 88.49 million constant LCU.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Ghana ahead.
Ecuador ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 37th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 constant LCU | 50 constant LCU | 50 constant LCU | Ghana |
| 2020s | 391.29 million constant LCU | 96.09 million constant LCU | 295.21 million constant LCU | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Ecuador or Ghana?
- Ecuador, at 568.91 million constant LCU against 480.43 million constant LCU in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Ecuador and Ghana?
- 88.49 million constant LCU, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ghana?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Ghana rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 37th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.