Djibouti vs Netherlands: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Djibouti
- Netherlands
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Netherlands, a difference of 0 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Netherlands ahead.
Djibouti ranks 67th and Netherlands ranks 67th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -132,229 constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | 132,229 constant LCU | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 33.33 constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | 33.33 constant LCU | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Djibouti or Netherlands?
- Djibouti, at 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Netherlands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Djibouti and Netherlands?
- 0 constant LCU, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Netherlands?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Netherlands rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Djibouti ranks 67th and Netherlands ranks 67th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.