Cuba vs South Sudan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Cuba, a difference of 0 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and South Sudan ranks 66th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 constant LCU | -388.00 million constant LCU | 388.00 million constant LCU | Cuba |
| 2010s | 100,000 constant LCU | 5.33 million constant LCU | 5.23 million constant LCU | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Cuba or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 constant LCU against 0 constant LCU in Cuba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 0 constant LCU, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 67th and South Sudan ranks 66th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.