Congo vs Russian Federation: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Congo
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Congo currently reports -550.36 billion constant LCU against -734.75 billion constant LCU in Russian Federation, a difference of 184.39 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Congo ranks 146th and Russian Federation ranks 147th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -429.65 billion constant LCU | -20.80 billion constant LCU | 408.86 billion constant LCU | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | -469.23 billion constant LCU | -728.24 billion constant LCU | 259.00 billion constant LCU | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Congo or Russian Federation?
- Congo, at -550.36 billion constant LCU against -734.75 billion constant LCU in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Congo and Russian Federation?
- 184.39 billion constant LCU, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Russian Federation rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Congo ranks 146th and Russian Federation ranks 147th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.