Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 474,200 constant LCU against 18,500 constant LCU in Chad, a difference of 455,700 constant LCU.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 25.6 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Chad ranks 57th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -33.33 constant LCU | 0 constant LCU | 33.33 constant LCU | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 9.43 billion constant LCU | 126,450 constant LCU | 9.43 billion constant LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 474,200 constant LCU against 18,500 constant LCU in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 455,700 constant LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Chad ranks 57th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.