Central African Republic vs Chad: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 382,600 constant LCU against 18,500 constant LCU in Chad, a difference of 364,100 constant LCU.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 20.7 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 55th and Chad ranks 57th of 154 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -7.76 billion constant LCU | -33.33 constant LCU | 7.76 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2020s | -896.32 million constant LCU | 9.43 billion constant LCU | 10.32 billion constant LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Central African Republic, at 382,600 constant LCU against 18,500 constant LCU in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 364,100 constant LCU, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Central African Republic ranks 55th and Chad ranks 57th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.