Cape Verde vs Tajikistan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Cape Verde
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3.74 billion constant LCU against 2.09 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 1.65 billion constant LCU.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.8 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Tajikistan ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 378.12 million constant LCU | 2.41 billion constant LCU | 2.03 billion constant LCU | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 2.03 billion constant LCU | 1.83 billion constant LCU | 206.04 million constant LCU | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Cape Verde or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3.74 billion constant LCU against 2.09 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Cape Verde and Tajikistan?
- 1.65 billion constant LCU, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Tajikistan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Tajikistan ranks 26th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.