Brunei Darussalam vs Tunisia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Tunisia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports -423.19 million constant LCU against -1.11 billion constant LCU in Tunisia, a difference of 691.51 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 128th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 441.13 million constant LCU | -1.60 billion constant LCU | 2.04 billion constant LCU | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2020s | 136.58 million constant LCU | 269.67 million constant LCU | 133.09 million constant LCU | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Brunei Darussalam or Tunisia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at -423.19 million constant LCU against -1.11 billion constant LCU in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia?
- 691.51 million constant LCU, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 128th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.