Brazil vs Burkina Faso: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Brazil
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 35.61 billion constant LCU against 17.27 billion constant LCU in Brazil, a difference of 18.34 billion constant LCU.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 2.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 18th and Burkina Faso ranks 15th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.34 billion constant LCU | 5.03 billion constant LCU | 6.32 billion constant LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 15.93 billion constant LCU | 71.12 billion constant LCU | 55.19 billion constant LCU | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Brazil or Burkina Faso?
- Burkina Faso, at 35.61 billion constant LCU against 17.27 billion constant LCU in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Brazil and Burkina Faso?
- 18.34 billion constant LCU, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Burkina Faso?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Burkina Faso rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Brazil ranks 18th and Burkina Faso ranks 15th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.