Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports -1.11 billion constant LCU against -2.94 billion constant LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.83 billion constant LCU.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 154 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at -1.11 billion constant LCU against -2.94 billion constant LCU in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
- 1.83 billion constant LCU, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.