Belize vs Palestine, State of: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Belize
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports -118.60 million constant LCU against -190.11 million constant LCU in Belize, a difference of 71.51 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 121st and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 154 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 152.08 million constant LCU | 28.52 million constant LCU | 123.56 million constant LCU | Belize |
| 2020s | -32.05 million constant LCU | -142.26 million constant LCU | 110.21 million constant LCU | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Belize or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at -118.60 million constant LCU against -190.11 million constant LCU in Belize as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Belize and Palestine, State of?
- 71.51 million constant LCU, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Palestine, State of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Palestine, State of rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Belize ranks 121st and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.