Belize vs Kosovo: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Belize
- Kosovo
How they compare
Belize currently reports -190.11 million constant LCU against -268.68 million constant LCU in Kosovo, a difference of 78.57 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 121st and Kosovo ranks 122nd of 154 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 126.54 million constant LCU | -79.73 million constant LCU | 206.27 million constant LCU | Belize |
| 2020s | -32.05 million constant LCU | -182.29 million constant LCU | 150.23 million constant LCU | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Belize or Kosovo?
- Belize, at -190.11 million constant LCU against -268.68 million constant LCU in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Belize and Kosovo?
- 78.57 million constant LCU, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Kosovo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Kosovo rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Belize ranks 121st and Kosovo ranks 122nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.