Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Bangladesh
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1.42 trillion constant LCU against 571.24 billion constant LCU in Bangladesh, a difference of 849.04 billion constant LCU.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 2.5 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Cambodia ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Cambodia ranks 6th of 154 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 253.73 billion constant LCU | 737.52 billion constant LCU | 483.79 billion constant LCU | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 526.45 billion constant LCU | 852.23 billion constant LCU | 325.78 billion constant LCU | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Bangladesh or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 1.42 trillion constant LCU against 571.24 billion constant LCU in Bangladesh as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 849.04 billion constant LCU, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Bangladesh ranks 7th and Cambodia ranks 6th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.