Azerbaijan vs New Zealand: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Azerbaijan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -2.07 billion constant LCU against -3.08 billion constant LCU in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1.01 billion constant LCU.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 154 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -861.71 million constant LCU | 8.24 billion constant LCU | 9.10 billion constant LCU | New Zealand |
| 2010s | -2.78 billion constant LCU | 5.21 billion constant LCU | 7.99 billion constant LCU | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Azerbaijan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at -2.07 billion constant LCU against -3.08 billion constant LCU in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Azerbaijan and New Zealand?
- 1.01 billion constant LCU, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Azerbaijan and New Zealand rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Azerbaijan ranks 134th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.