Argentina vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Argentina
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -2.94 billion constant LCU against -7.05 billion constant LCU in Argentina, a difference of 4.11 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2021 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 136th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd of 154 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Argentina or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -2.94 billion constant LCU against -7.05 billion constant LCU in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 4.11 billion constant LCU, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Argentina ranks 136th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.