Angola vs Indonesia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Angola
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 234.87 trillion constant LCU against 16.86 trillion constant LCU in Angola, a difference of 218.01 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 13.9 times Angola's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 3rd and Indonesia ranks 1st of 154 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -108.26 billion constant LCU | 83.14 trillion constant LCU | 83.25 trillion constant LCU | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 272.60 billion constant LCU | 223.80 trillion constant LCU | 223.52 trillion constant LCU | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Angola or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 234.87 trillion constant LCU against 16.86 trillion constant LCU in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Angola and Indonesia?
- 218.01 trillion constant LCU, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Indonesia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Indonesia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Angola ranks 3rd and Indonesia ranks 1st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.