Angola vs Colombia: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Angola
- Colombia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 16.86 trillion constant LCU against 1.60 trillion constant LCU in Colombia, a difference of 15.25 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Angola's figure about 10.5 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Colombia ahead.
Angola ranks 3rd and Colombia ranks 4th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Colombia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -108.26 billion constant LCU | 260.60 billion constant LCU | 368.86 billion constant LCU | Colombia |
| 2020s | 272.60 billion constant LCU | -557.67 billion constant LCU | 830.27 billion constant LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Angola or Colombia?
- Angola, at 16.86 trillion constant LCU against 1.60 trillion constant LCU in Colombia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Angola and Colombia?
- 15.25 trillion constant LCU, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Colombia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Colombia rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Angola ranks 3rd and Colombia ranks 4th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.