Algeria vs Kazakhstan: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP
Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP over time
- Algeria
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Algeria currently reports -1.32 trillion constant LCU against -1.88 trillion constant LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 561.44 billion constant LCU.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 148th and Kazakhstan ranks 150th of 154 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -131.15 billion constant LCU | -376.08 billion constant LCU | 244.93 billion constant LCU | Algeria |
| 2010s | -760.61 billion constant LCU | -1.02 trillion constant LCU | 259.57 billion constant LCU | Algeria |
| 2020s | -1.04 trillion constant LCU | -1.63 trillion constant LCU | 589.29 billion constant LCU | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp, Algeria or Kazakhstan?
- Algeria, at -1.32 trillion constant LCU against -1.88 trillion constant LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp between Algeria and Kazakhstan?
- 561.44 billion constant LCU, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Kazakhstan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Kazakhstan rank globally for discrepancy in expenditure estimate of gdp?
- Algeria ranks 148th and Kazakhstan ranks 150th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the underlying series have been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country.