Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers

Equatorial Guinea
0.0439 Index
in 2025
Eswatini
0.0659 Index
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
5th
Eswatini rank
3rd

Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
00.020.040.06201420192025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0659 Index against 0.0439 Index in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.022 Index.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 18 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0439 Index 0.0146 Index 0.0293 Index Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0439 Index 0.0585 Index 0.0146 Index Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher digital services trade restrictiveness index — other barriers, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0659 Index against 0.0439 Index in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in digital services trade restrictiveness index — other barriers between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
0.022 Index, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for digital services trade restrictiveness index — other barriers?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers affecting trade in digitally enabled services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/digital-services-trade-restrictiveness-index-other-barriers-affecting-trade-in-digitally/equatorial-guinea-2/eswatini-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/digital-services-trade-restrictiveness-index-other-barriers-affecting-trade-in-digitally/equatorial-guinea-2/eswatini-2/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index — Other barriers affecting trade in digitally enabled services
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
129 places, 1,548 data points, 2014–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD Digital STRI identifies, catalogues and quantifies barriers that affect trade in digitally enabled services across 129 countries. It provides policy makers with an evidence-based tool that helps to identify regulatory bottlenecks, design policies that foster more competitive and diversified markets for digital trade, and analyze the impact of policy reforms. The OECD Digital STRI captures cross-cutting impediments that affect all types of services traded digitally. As a stand-alone instrument, it complements the OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI). A zip file containing the OECD Digital STRI indices for all countries available over 2014-2025 can be downloaded here: OECD Digital STRI 2014-2025