Hong Kong vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita

Hong Kong
108.77 grams of fat per day per capita
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
107.34 grams of fat per day per capita
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
75th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
78th

Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Trinidad and Tobago
6080100120140196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 108.77 grams of fat per day per capita against 107.34 grams of fat per day per capita in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.43 grams of fat per day per capita.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 192 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 90.96 grams of fat per day per capita 52.02 grams of fat per day per capita 38.94 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
1970s 97.18 grams of fat per day per capita 56.32 grams of fat per day per capita 40.85 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
1980s 117.61 grams of fat per day per capita 77.11 grams of fat per day per capita 40.5 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
1990s 137.63 grams of fat per day per capita 70.11 grams of fat per day per capita 67.52 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
2000s 136.04 grams of fat per day per capita 77.34 grams of fat per day per capita 58.69 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
2010s 125.68 grams of fat per day per capita 97.21 grams of fat per day per capita 28.48 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong
2020s 120.16 grams of fat per day per capita 102.82 grams of fat per day per capita 17.35 grams of fat per day per capita Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher daily per capita fat supply vs. gdp per capita, Hong Kong or Trinidad and Tobago?
Hong Kong, at 108.77 grams of fat per day per capita against 107.34 grams of fat per day per capita in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in daily per capita fat supply vs. gdp per capita between Hong Kong and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.43 grams of fat per day per capita, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for daily per capita fat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Hong Kong ranks 75th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/daily-per-capita-fat-supply-vs-gdp-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/daily-per-capita-fat-supply-vs-gdp-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/trinidad-and-tobago/">Hong Kong vs Trinidad and Tobago: Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Daily per capita fat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of fat per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower. This is the total of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock.