Ecuador vs Kenya: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male over time
- Ecuador
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 83.19 % against 81.9 % in Ecuador, a difference of 1.29 %.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 26th and Kenya ranks 23rd of 74 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.4 % | 47.46 % | 14.94 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 74.3 % | 66.96 % | 7.34 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 79.37 % | 70.92 % | 8.44 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male, Ecuador or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 83.19 % against 81.9 % in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male between Ecuador and Kenya?
- 1.29 %, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male?
- Ecuador ranks 26th and Kenya ranks 23rd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.