Belgium vs Norway: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 83.78 % against 82.42 % in Norway, a difference of 1.36 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 22nd and Norway ranks 25th of 74 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.23 % | 75.68 % | 4.55 % | Belgium |
| 2020s | 84.03 % | 80.53 % | 3.5 % | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male, Belgium or Norway?
- Belgium, at 83.78 % against 82.42 % in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male between Belgium and Norway?
- 1.36 %, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — male?
- Belgium ranks 22nd and Norway ranks 25th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.