Peru vs Romania: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Female
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Female over time
- Peru
- Romania
How they compare
Peru currently reports 92.1 % against 91.22 % in Romania, a difference of 0.88 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Romania ahead.
Peru ranks 13th and Romania ranks 16th of 74 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.7 % | 92.34 % | 8.64 % | Romania |
| 2010s | 87.98 % | 90.12 % | 2.14 % | Romania |
| 2020s | 92.55 % | 91.12 % | 1.43 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — female, Peru or Romania?
- Peru, at 92.1 % against 91.22 % in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — female between Peru and Romania?
- 0.88 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Romania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Peru and Romania rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — female?
- Peru ranks 13th and Romania ranks 16th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.