Dominican Republic vs Philippines: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- Dominican Republic
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 69.03 % against 66.3 % in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.73 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 80 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.75 % | 72.29 % | 18.54 % | Philippines |
| 2010s | 62.07 % | 78.83 % | 16.76 % | Philippines |
| 2020s | 67.3 % | 69.03 % | 1.73 % | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age, Dominican Republic or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 69.03 % against 66.3 % in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age between Dominican Republic and Philippines?
- 2.73 %, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Dominican Republic and Philippines rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- Dominican Republic ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.