Argentina vs China, mainland: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- Argentina
- China, mainland
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 77.78 % against 76.2 % in Argentina, a difference of 1.58 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China, mainland ahead.
Argentina ranks 40th and China, mainland ranks 39th of 80 countries.
China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age, Argentina or China, mainland?
- China, mainland, at 77.78 % against 76.2 % in Argentina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age between Argentina and China, mainland?
- 1.58 %, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and China, mainland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and China, mainland rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- Argentina ranks 40th and China, mainland ranks 39th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.