Panama vs Thailand: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Panama
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 57.73 % against 53.5 % in Panama, a difference of 4.23 %.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 41st and Thailand ranks 38th of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.8 % | 24.39 % | 3.41 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 39.87 % | 44.91 % | 5.04 % | Thailand |
| 2020s | 54.2 % | 57.73 % | 3.53 % | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Panama or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 57.73 % against 53.5 % in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Panama and Thailand?
- 4.23 %, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Panama and Thailand rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Panama ranks 41st and Thailand ranks 38th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.