Luxembourg vs Peru: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Luxembourg
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 83.8 % against 81.58 % in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.22 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 21st and Peru ranks 18th of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.17 % | 51.75 % | 20.42 % | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 76.94 % | 66.73 % | 10.21 % | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 78.97 % | 79.7 % | 0.735 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Luxembourg or Peru?
- Peru, at 83.8 % against 81.58 % in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Luxembourg and Peru?
- 2.22 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Peru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Peru rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Luxembourg ranks 21st and Peru ranks 18th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.