Greece vs Latvia: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Greece
- Latvia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 93.58 % against 93.34 % in Latvia, a difference of 0.24 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Greece ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.88 % | 74.43 % | 14.55 % | Latvia |
| 2010s | 79.93 % | 77.09 % | 2.84 % | Greece |
| 2020s | 91.85 % | 93.34 % | 1.49 % | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Greece or Latvia?
- Greece, at 93.58 % against 93.34 % in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Greece and Latvia?
- 0.24 %, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Greece and Latvia rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Greece ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.