Ecuador vs Mongolia: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 73.21 % against 70.5 % in Ecuador, a difference of 2.71 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 30th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4 % | 25.78 % | 2.62 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 50.12 % | 39.98 % | 10.15 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 69.43 % | 72.52 % | 3.08 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 73.21 % against 70.5 % in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 2.71 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Ecuador ranks 30th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.