Honduras vs Lesotho: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Female
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Female over time
- Honduras
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 35.3 % against 23.11 % in Honduras, a difference of 12.19 %.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.5 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.
Honduras ranks 55th and Lesotho ranks 52nd of 75 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.55 % | 13.5 % | 1.05 % | Honduras |
| 2010s | 24.65 % | 17.32 % | 7.32 % | Honduras |
| 2020s | 23.11 % | 35.3 % | 12.19 % | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — female, Honduras or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 35.3 % against 23.11 % in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — female between Honduras and Lesotho?
- 12.19 %, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lesotho?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Lesotho rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — female?
- Honduras ranks 55th and Lesotho ranks 52nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.