Lithuania vs Russian Federation: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age over time
- Lithuania
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 89.13 % against 86.43 % in Lithuania, a difference of 2.7 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 79 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 92.26 % | 86.62 % | 5.65 % | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 86.59 % | 89.69 % | 3.11 % | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age, Lithuania or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 89.13 % against 86.43 % in Lithuania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age between Lithuania and Russian Federation?
- 2.7 %, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Russian Federation rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age?
- Lithuania ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.