China, mainland vs Ecuador: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age over time
- China, mainland
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 72.3 % against 70.69 % in China, mainland, a difference of 1.61 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
China, mainland ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 79 countries.
China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age, China, mainland or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 72.3 % against 70.69 % in China, mainland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age between China, mainland and Ecuador?
- 1.61 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Ecuador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do China, mainland and Ecuador rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — all age?
- China, mainland ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.