El Salvador vs Suriname: Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or
Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or over time
- El Salvador
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 95.44 % against 94.5 % in El Salvador, a difference of 0.94 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 49th and Suriname ranks 47th of 75 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.5 % | 82.06 % | 4.44 % | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 90.7 % | 87.34 % | 3.36 % | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 92.7 % | 95.44 % | 2.74 % | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or, El Salvador or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 95.44 % against 94.5 % in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or between El Salvador and Suriname?
- 0.94 %, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Suriname rank globally for completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or?
- El Salvador ranks 49th and Suriname ranks 47th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.