Ecuador vs Peru: Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or
Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 98.8 % against 98.7 % in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 27th and Peru ranks 26th of 75 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.57 % | 94.49 % | 0.0857 % | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 98.18 % | 97.53 % | 0.65 % | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 98.85 % | 98.55 % | 0.3 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 98.8 % against 98.7 % in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or between Ecuador and Peru?
- 0.1 %, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for completion rate, primary education, urban — value — all age ranges or?
- Ecuador ranks 27th and Peru ranks 26th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.