Brazil vs Dominican Republic: Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Male — All age
Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Male — All age over time
- Brazil
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 93.8 % against 90.5 % in Dominican Republic, a difference of 3.3 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Brazil ranks 42nd and Dominican Republic ranks 45th of 70 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.9 % | 66.84 % | 2.06 % | Brazil |
| 2010s | 84.86 % | 81.27 % | 3.59 % | Brazil |
| 2020s | 93.28 % | 90.22 % | 3.05 % | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, rural — value — male — all age, Brazil or Dominican Republic?
- Brazil, at 93.8 % against 90.5 % in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, rural — value — male — all age between Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 3.3 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Dominican Republic rank globally for completion rate, primary education, rural — value — male — all age?
- Brazil ranks 42nd and Dominican Republic ranks 45th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.