Cyprus vs Lithuania: Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Female — All age
Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Female — All age over time
- Cyprus
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 99.56 % against 99.08 % in Cyprus, a difference of 0.48 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.48 % | 99.48 % | 0.0025 % | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 99.33 % | 99.28 % | 0.04 % | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 99.08 % | 99.5 % | 0.42 % | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, rural — value — female — all age, Cyprus or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 99.56 % against 99.08 % in Cyprus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, rural — value — female — all age between Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 0.48 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Cyprus and Lithuania rank globally for completion rate, primary education, rural — value — female — all age?
- Cyprus ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.