Russian Federation vs Sweden: Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or
Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or over time
- Russian Federation
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 99.28 % against 99.23 % in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.05 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 76 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 99.8 % | 98.68 % | 1.12 % | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 99.03 % | 98.89 % | 0.145 % | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or, Russian Federation or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 99.28 % against 99.23 % in Russian Federation as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or between Russian Federation and Sweden?
- 0.05 %, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Russian Federation and Sweden rank globally for completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or?
- Russian Federation ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.